Effective Training Inc. Message Board

ETI Discussion Forum: Discuss GD&T, tolerance analysis, and other GD&T-related topics
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:10 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:46 am 

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:20 pm
Posts: 1
Regarding Tolerance Analysis on a thermally affected part.
Stacking between two holes in the part.
I would adjust for the thermal effects on the hole sizes and the Basic dimension between the holes.
Should the Tolerance of Position (i.e. cylindrical tolerance zone) values also be altered?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:22 pm 

Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:14 pm
Posts: 1
Bill, I haven't done thermal compensation in a stack before, but my vote would be "yes". To justify my thinking, I think of r*alpha*dT. Then I think of a limiting case because its hard for me to think in terms of .005 inch tolerances. Imagine the two hole centerlines being 3 inches apart. Then imagine an extreme case where the TOP tolerance was DIAM 1.0 inch. To me it then becomes obvious that the TOP tolerance must be thermally adjusted, otherwise, you are only adjusting the BASIC 3.0 inch, when in reality the hole centerlines could be 4 inches apart. I would use r*alpha*dT on the 4 inch value, not the 3.0 inch value. So, I would adjust the BASIC, hole SIZE, and TOP for thermal shift. Good question. Thanks, Matt


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
POWERED_BY

phpBB SEO